|
|
@@ -1,34 +1,40 @@
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
18:17 < Biolunar> when i change my resolution in dwm (to a smaller one) and then back to the native, the top bar is not repainted. that's since 5.7.2, in 5.6 it worked fine
|
|
|
18:19 < Biolunar> is it just happening to me or a (known) bug?
|
|
|
18:24 < Biolunar> and in addition, mplayers fullscreen is limited to the small resolution after i changed it back to the native
|
|
|
|
|
|
reproducible with xrandr -s but not with --output and --mode, strange
|
|
|
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
|
|
|
> enternotify is handled even when the entered window is already focused
|
|
|
> (eg moving the mouse to the bar and back, scrolling on the border..)
|
|
|
- >
|
|
|
- > focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
|
|
|
- >
|
|
|
- > a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
|
|
|
- >
|
|
|
- > + c = wintoclient(ev->window);
|
|
|
- > if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
|
|
|
- > unfocus(selmon->sel);
|
|
|
- > selmon = m;
|
|
|
- > }
|
|
|
- > + else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
|
|
|
- > + return;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
+>
|
|
|
+> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
|
|
|
+>
|
|
|
+> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
|
|
|
+>
|
|
|
+> + c = wintoclient(ev->window);
|
|
|
+> if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
|
|
|
+> unfocus(selmon->sel);
|
|
|
+> selmon = m;
|
|
|
+> }
|
|
|
+> + else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
|
|
|
+> + return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
|
|
|
> another corner case:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a tiled client can be resized with mod+right click, but it only works
|
|
|
on the main monitor
|
|
|
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
dmenu appears on the monitor where the pointer is and not on selmon
|
|
|
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
|
|
|
yet another corner case:
|
|
|
open a terminal, focus another monitor, but without moving the mouse
|
|
|
@@ -36,7 +42,6 @@ pointer there
|
|
|
if there is no client on the other monitor to get the focus, then the
|
|
|
terminal will be unfocused but it will accept input
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Allen reported this:
|
|
|
@@ -57,3 +62,15 @@ privmail from 2 other people within one week, really strange).
|
|
|
The quick fix is commenting out the code in lines 817/818 in hg tip
|
|
|
dwm. I cannot confirm this has no side effects (I think it does) and I
|
|
|
will address this issue shortly with a real fix.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+SDL seems to not like non-reparenting WMs:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+> I would like to mention SDL problems, however SDL is not crucial to
|
|
|
+> me anymore; people that really care about it should speak up and
|
|
|
+> propose dwm / SDL patch or cooperation scheme in that matter.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Patching SDL, bugging them?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+---
|